Chicago Schools With Mostly Low-income Students See Inequitable Funding Standards

rents assume that their children are getting anschool activities, such as the broadcast club, chess
equitable education, regardless of where theyclub and competitive sports.
attend school or in what district. However,The low-income Chicago schools cannot compete
Chicago schools may differ in educationalwith wealthier districts, and the children are not as
opportunities, depending upon several factors —prepared for college or post-graduate careers.
the most prominent being the percentage ofChicago schools education advocates are
low-income students and the quality of propertyconcerned with the wide variation in school district
values within the different districts. With many ofper student funding amounts across the state,
the Chicago schools providing education towhich ranges from $4,437 to $23,798 per
low-income students, these factors impact thestudent. They believe it is unfair that poor Chicago
quality of education your children may receive.schools have to choose between the basic needs
Let’s look at Chicago schools Generalof children in poorer families and education
George Patton School District 133. Its low-incomeenhancements that are demanded by parents in
students comprise 97 percent of the overallwealthier Chicago schools.
students educated within the district. The stateSome of the contributing factors for inequalities in
standard per student funding is $8,786. PattonChicago schools are:
receives $10,144 per student, 15 percent above• Chicago schools have to pay teachers more
the standard. Sounds good? It’s not.than rural schools, since their cost of living is
Low-income Chicago schools must provide for thehigher in Chicago; but much less than wealthier
special needs of the low-income students, such asschools — many teachers do not have a college
extra tutoring programs, remedial programs,major or minor within the subjects they teach
preschool, and free lunches. Once the normal(mathematics, for instance),
costs of special education and transportation are• Most Chicago schools spend more on bilingual
added in, there is little left of the school’seducation to serve the growing immigrant
budget for typical needs, let alone educationalpopulations,
enhancements. Some of the Patton students• Low-income Chicago schools have higher
cannot even take textbooks home to study,costs for administration and support services to
because there are not enough for each student.address the students’ attendance,
Low-income Chicago schools must provide suchemotional and academic issues, and
services to ensure the children living in poor• Low-income Chicago schools receive most of
families have the same education advantages astheir funding from state and federal government
their other children. With no formal educationgrants; whereas, wealthier school districts receive
before kindergarten, they need the extrathe bulk of their funding locally, most of which is
schooling that many times must continuefrom property taxes.
throughout elementary school.The funding source also causes difficulties for
Now let’s compare Patton to Northbrooklow-income Chicago schools. State and federal
School District 27 (not in the Chicago schoolsgrants come with more strings attached than local
area). It has a school budget of $20 million perfunding. They dictate to the Chicago schools how
year for 1,310 students — $15,308 per student.the money is used and cause more administrative
It has only 0.6 percent low-income students and acosts in dealing with the associated red tape.
sky-high property tax base from which to drawThese Chicago schools are vulnerable to the
funds — according to the Northern Multiplewhims of the politicians, who may create or
Listing Service, the average home in this schoolcancel a program to ensure reelection. The
district carries more than $2 million in value.financial status of the state and federal budgets
Northbrook spends very little on low-incomeaffect low-income Chicago schools annually. Lastly,
student services. They can afford well-educatedmany grants are tied to specific programs and
teachers. Students have access to wirelessinitiatives, taking away a lot of the choices and
laptops starting in fourth grade. They provideflexibility that the wealthier schools enjoy.
continual teacher professional development andSo, when choosing a school for your children from
administration support. Student has daily physicalthe Chicago schools system, determine the
education classes, art and music twice a week,percentage of low-income children that make up
and daily interaction with technology — theythe school’s student body and research
have over 700 computers and a seven-personthe median property values for the area. Ask the
technology staff. Their gifted program meetsschool principal what percentage of their funding is
several times a week for children in kindergartenfrom government grants and what comes from
through third grade, and daily for as long as threelocal funding.
periods for fourth graders. They provide after