No Child Left Behind - Federally Financed Tutoring

The No Child Left Behind Law allows students insecurity to remove a tutoring provider because
schools that have fallen short of performancethey were harassing families. The parents felt as
goals to get free tutoring. With more and morethough they were being pressured to sign their
schools and students being classified as 'failing',children up for tutoring services. In New York,
more families are looking into tutoring. As a resultcomplaints surfaced about inappropriate incentives
of this, tutoring has become a booming privatebeing offered to families.
enterprise. Up to 600,000 students in the US arePotential fraud is also an issue. A tutoring
now receiving tutoring. Tutoring is now beingcompany called Platform Learning had to leave
offered by private companies and other groups.seven schools because of the numerous and
Tutors can be paid over 1,000 and privaterepeated absences of tutors. Students in need of
companies are eager to get involved in thishelp are abandoned.
lucrative business. Such companies have offeredNo Child Left Behind requires teachers to be highly
parents incentives like computers and giftqualified but it does not require that of tutors.
certificates if they sign their child up for theirStandards are lowered because the tutor
tutoring services. This practice may be unseemlyproviders who come in are not familiar with the
but it is not illegal.curriculum, the school or the students.
These new tutoring providers are comprised ofSome local governments and organizations are
nonprofit and profit organizations along with faithtrying to improve the situation. The Education
based organizations. Many times the tutoringIndustry Association developed a code of ethics
offered in not in concert with classroomfor tutoring providers. In 2005 an education
instruction. Other problems are that sometimesassociation drafted an ethical code for these
tutors don't show up and tutoring groups of tentutoring companies to adopt. The code doesn't
or more students do not produce results. Therediscuss student achievement but it does urge
are also few tutoring services available for ESL ortutoring providers to refrain from offering
special education students.incentive to sign up and misrepresenting their
Of course tutoring is not a bad thing but theseservices and programs. What prompted the
new federally financed tutoring programs are notdevelopment of the code was that there were
regulated. This concerns school districts andreports that a few tutoring providers were giving
elected officials. Some members of congressa sign-on bonus for using their services. Many
want companies that offer private tutoring to bepeople were outraged by this. Officials stated that
regulated and quality standards introduced. This istutoring is not like sports and sign-on bonuses
to make sure qualified tutors are qualified to workwere inappropriate in the academic arena.
with students and the tutoring companies giveOfficials believe the tutoring business needs
services that meet the needs of the student.standards if the industry is going to grow and
There have been problems with tutoring providerschange.
in some schools. In Nevada, a school had to call