No Child Left Behind - Who's Getting Rich?

The "No Child Left Behind" law (NCLB), signed by(reported approx. 70,000 SES students in '04)
President George W. Bush on January 8, 2002 hashave consistently been fighting for the top spot.
shifted the way schools must deal with theirThese programs are free to the students and
student population. While the verdict is still out onyet are generating millions of dollars, tax payer
whether or not the NCLB is beneficial for schoolsdollars, for the companies operating them. The
around the country, one must still ask thefight for student numbers in these programs is
question, does that even matter? After all, arefierce. These companies are aggressively pursuing
schools developed to benefit the schoolsstudent populations for enrollment into their
themselves or the students that occupy them?programs for pure profit.
Several states are now taking issue with theThe fact is that one student attending an SES
NCLB, stating that they are losing money as aprovider program generates approximately $1500
result of this law. Before we get exasperatedper semester of attendance. This fee yields these
with our current President however, remembercompanies millions of dollars and takes those
that the initial intention of NCLB was pure. Withdollars directly from the schools. Millions of
schools failing to reach federal standards acrosstaxpayer dollars are leaving the schools and going
the country, something had to be done,into the pockets of private sector companies, all
subsequently, for the first time in the history ofunder the guise of helping students improve their
education a level of accountability was beingacademic position. Some companies have
implemented nationwide. Tying results to theproduced statistical data to prove their programs
bottom line seemed to be a good idea.are better than others. Numbers don't lie. Or do
NCLB has had 4 years to produce results andthey? Statistics are easy to use and manipulate
even now many states are not in agreement withto prove whatever your objective is. Are the
the current administration on the effectiveness ofstudents really benefiting?
this new law. "Utah's legislature passed a bill givingSome SES providers are profiting so much that
state education law priority over NCLB, eventhey can afford to offer incentives to the
though the decision could cost the state morestudents for attendance. There are students
than $76 million in federal funding. Colorado alsoacross the country receiving incentives equaling
allows local districts to opt out of NCLB without$100 for perfect attendance. The profit is so
incurring penalties from the state" according tosignificant that SES providers can pay their staff,
Ellen R. Delisio (Education-World.com, 2005).develop and purchase materials, create marketing
More states are following suit in fighting NCLB andmaterials and offer student's incentives to
the Federal Government. The focus seems to beparticipate in their program.
on the fact that the Federal government hasIs it no wonder why tax payers refuse to vote in
given states a mandate but has not funded thefavor of school bonds across the country? With
states with enough money to implement thismillions of dollars leaving the schools and going into
mandate. A perfect example of this shortfall is inthe private sector, why do we think that
Connecticut where officials recently ascertainedtaxpayers, already feeling taxed to death, would
that full execution of NCLB will cost the stateoffer more cash to the seemingly bottomless pit
$41.6 million more than the state receives fromof education? The new push is for parents to
the federal government through fiscal year 2008.obtain outside education assistance for students.
(Education-World.com, 2005)This year parents are expected to spend $2.5
Connecticut has filed a law suit to fight againstbillion dollars nationwide on additional academic
NCLB; that suit is pending. The fact is that schoolstutoring. This can't be the answer. Why can't the
in Connecticut repeatedly perform higher onstudents learn the necessary information within
annual standardized tests. However, there arethe same school day as their parents and
significant pockets of failure among minoritygrandparents before them?
children, which is why NCLB was instituted, toSo what is the solution? No one has come up with
make sure quality education was provided fora solution that works. One has to question
ALL students in all areas. Civil rights leaders havewhether taking millions of dollars from the current
taken a strong stance in the fight, stating that theschool system is the answer. The fact that
Connecticut law suit is "ill-advised" and will only hurtstudents are not being given the basic level of
the children.education necessary across the board is not
The list of schools that have been labeled asacceptable. The question is how do we redesign
failing was released on September 1st In Arizonaan entire educational system to produce success?
13 east valley schools have failed under the NCLBLet me give you something to ponder over the
guidelines. Reportedly 21% of Arizona schoolsnext few months as the whole NCLB situation
failed to meet "adequate yearly progress," thisplays itself out across the country. The problem is
number increased 3 percentage points from '04.not the teachers, or the principles within the
All the information seems to point towards ourschools, it is simply an issue of systems. The
school system moving backwards. Yet despitesystem is not working and yet we hold onto it
reports that showed 21% of Arizona schools hadlike in time it will get better. Our current
not made "adequate progress", SAT scores foreducational system is antiquated and it is not
students in Arizona hit an all-time high.reaching the current clientele. What about taking
Since the inception of NCLB a new industry hassome of the millions of dollars that are finding
exploded. Within the last 4 years a multitude oftheir way into privately held multi-million dollar
educational companies, close to 1800, have foundcompanies and disperse that to the instructors
their way onto a multitude of our statesthat are creating an atmosphere conducive to
Supplemental Education Services (SES) providerslearning? Why not look to reward instructors for
lists (ASU news release, 8/29). The mostfinding ways to reach their population? The fact is
prominent of these companies produce millions ofthat teaching is one of the lowest paid
dollars in revenue and have created a nicheprofessions in the world. It's time we took notice
market, operating on the failure of schools toof that and kept the money in the schools and
reach their disengaged students. While the 1800+rewarded those instructors that are gaining
companies have developed SES programs,ground and reaching their student populations,
Newton Learning (reported between 80,000 -while providing specified trainings for those that
90,000 SES students in '04) and Sylvan Learningare failing to reach their students.