So long Primary School Science, and thanks for all the fun

Information about the future comes from theexternal testing, puts primary science back a
strangest places. Apparently, if you want to knowcouple of decades. This is a blow for enthusiasts;
what the future of communications will be, youbut it will come as a relief to teachers who have
need to consult producers of adult material. Theyalways found science difficult and those who have
were the first to exploit videotape, CD-Rom andlittle empathy with the subject.
the Internet. Whatever technology they areI find no comfort in the response of the
working on right now is likely to be the next bigopinion-makers - the QCDA, the SLCs, SCORE,
thing. Is it Blue-Ray? 3-D? Even 4-D?NAIGs and the ASE. It's not that they don't have
A comparison of with educational publishers maythe subject's best interests at heart. But they
seem a little tenuous. But maybe, like them, theseem to have spent too long in the company of
publishers know something. It is significant thatthe converted. Of course the primary school
there was not any new primary sciencescience enthusiasts will 'make strong and relevant
equipment on the stands at the 2010 ASE Annualconnections between subjects to ensure
Conference in Nottingham this January. Actually,meaningful and inspiring learning and full coverage
there were not even any old ones. After theof the whole curriculum' as the ASE's 'Science in
years when the stands would be full of files andthe proposed new primary curriculum'. But will this
glossy books and discs, there was nothing forkind of optimistic curriculum-speak be reflected in
primary teachers to lust after, or even browsereal schools by real teachers who teach other
on. Whatever the educational publishers aresubjects brilliantly but have no burning desire to
working on, it ain't primary science.teach science?
There may be good reasons for this. ManyAnd where are the skills of science? The ASE
resources are now available online. It's possible toresponse says 'there is no longer a separation of
look up a lesson plan on one of a hundred'how to do science' and 'things to learn about'.
websites that offer the full Monty - from planningInvestigative skills are integrated throughout the
to assessment. Many staff libraries are alreadyarea of learning. Children will learn by doing.' (4)
groaning with primary science resources - someAgain, sounds wonderful. No argument there, then.
of them regularly used. Government publicationsAnd yet there is. The skills of primary education
cover a lot of the ground, and don't have toare not the same as the skills of practical science.
make a profit like commercial ones. So it's aThe whole point about science is that it's not a
tough time for publishers, waiting to see whetherskill common to other curriculum areas. Uniquely,
the Rose Report will be adopted - or even ifscience subjects ideas to practical testing. No
there is a change of government which might putother curriculum area does that. If science is
Rose-related publishing in the recycling bin. How doallowed to slide into the cosy world of overarching
you publish for a curriculum that is significantlyskills and soft topics, a whole generation will lose
local, individual and eclectic? Much safer to print forout on its rigor.
the National Strategies - go for core sales inSo what should the primary science mafia, the
language and numeracy. So no new primaryschool curriculum leaders, the local authority
science publishing - yet. It wasn't always so. Iadvisers (where they exist) and the college
recall travelling to Wales, twenty years ago, tolecturers who have carried the flag so far, be
talk about the publication of a new primarydoing? The optimists are planning for stand-alone
science scheme. I was mobbed - literally. The talkscience lessons. The pessimists are banking on a
had to be moved from the school (not bigchange of government. It would be nice to think
enough) to the village hall. A hundred teachers ledthat the Rose Report would be dropped in the
me down the street.dustbin of history. But that's unlikely. 'On 30 April
It goes without saying that since those days,2009, the government accepted the proposals of
primary school science has been a huge successthe Rose review of the primary curriculum. Since
story. Through the work of enthusiastic teachersthis nominally independent review adhered to a
both in and out of schools, it has established itselfnarrow government remit, refrained from
as an essential part of a full primary education. Itquestioning existing policy and for good measure
certainly helped that it was given core statuswas managed by DCSF, its adoption was a
alongside English and mathematics; that it wasforegone conclusion'. Oh, and its brief did not
subject to SATs testing and to reporting, andinclude assessment.
importantly that both children and teachers hugelySo it's down to the foot soldiers again, folks. If
enjoyed it.primary school science is not to be sidelined and
The key factor in establishing it so soundly infinally ditched in the future, they need to ensure
classrooms in the first place was the work ofthat its presence is maintained. And I suggest
Education Support Grant teachers. ESG teamsthree pragmatic strategies in your school.
across the country worked in different ways toFirst, aim for a high profile. Some subjects are
show primary teachers how to manage this 'newnaturally showy. Science is not. Like PE, the best
subject.' The ASE history of primary sciencemoments in science are practical and often go
makes no mention of these foot soldiers. It's aunrecorded. The products of science are not as
shameful omission. The great and the good mayengaging as those of the arty subjects. So go for
have fought the political battles to establishpresence. Record on film, on tape, in pictures. Fill
science as a core subject, but the realdisplay space. Constantly remind teachers that this
grass-roots changes were the work of ESGis a school where good science happens - and
teams and the curriculum leaders in schools, whothat children gain hugely from it.
encouraged and supported primary teachers. TheNext, push for curriculum time. If there are six
work of science coordinators is the life-blood oftopics in a year, make two of them science.
the subject. The result of their efforts is the UK'sArgue that the skills and content can't possibly be
exceptional showing in international comparisons.covered if they are given a small corner of a
We do it well.topic on pirates or Vikings. Avoid the super-topics,
I've worked for forty years in primary educationlike 'water'. We've been there before, thirty years
- the last twenty-five largely in primary schoolago. They sound like they can be full of science,
science. When I started, my bible was the Nuffieldbut most offer great opportunities to relegate
Junior Science Project. A contributor to it wasinvestigations to the back burner.
another enthusiastic young teacher called JimFinally, fight for funding. Science resources are
Rose. Forty years later, the subject is in seriousessential for this practical subject. Ensure that
trouble, and ironically, his report is not helping. I'mconsumables are replaced and breakages
unconvinced by arguments that primary science ismanaged. Go for the exciting and spectacular. The
about to enter a great new decade of excitingscience cupboard should not be a place where
developments. I'd love to agree, but I'm a primarymagnets go to die; it should be filled with engaging
scientist and I work from evidence. I attended aand reliable resources that will excite and engage.
recent regional ASE meeting on science and theYou can get amazing stuff these days that I
new curriculum, excellently planned and executed,could only dream of when I started.
with some really helpful practical ideas. EightI see everything I have worked for going down
teachers attended. Contrast that with my villagethe plug. But don't worry about me. I've got
hall experience.plenty to do. Over the past quarter-century, I've
A great new era in primary school science? Allowbeen lucky enough to have been involved in
me a Victor Meldrew moment. I don't believe it.writing the primary science resources used in
I'm not the only one to think like this. Themany of our schools - books, television, discs,
Cambridge Primary Review remarks thatwebsites. Nowadays my commissions come from
'Worryingly, primary science, which was one ofabroad. In many countries, they are waking up to
the success stories of the National Curriculum'sthe idea that their children need a sound grounding
first decade, has been squeezed by the nationalin science - just as we are forgetting it. Their
strategies, retaining its albeit reduced place onlychildren want colour and excitement; their
because it was tested at the end of key stage 2.teachers can learn from our experience.
Science is far too important to both a balancedI recently had the pleasure of meeting a number
education and the nation's future to be allowed toof my ex-primary pupils at a school reunion. It
decline in this way.'was a complete joy, but I especially treasure a
Rose reflects current primary practice, and this iscomment from one young man, once an
welcome. We are assured, too, that primaryenthusiastic ten-year-old, now director of a
school science will continue to be assessed andnational professional organisation and an adviser to
monitored. Nobody wants the SATs back in thegovernment. 'When I was in your class,' he said, 'I
form in which they could undermine the wholeused to walk to school thinking: Great! Something
Year 6 experience - and sometimes scienceexciting is going to happen today.' Just make sure
teaching throughout the school. But the loss ofthat something exciting happens in your school,
core status (even second division core), and oftoo.