Traditional Training Vs Elearning Solutions - Which is More Cost Effective

In a period of financial difficulty, such as the oneforce that really needs to be retained, and how
being experienced by the entire world right now,much of the employees is a realistic figure to let
the key to survival of most companies is ingo off. The process, however, should not stop
seeking out solutions with the maximum ofthere. The remaining number of the workforce
benefits with the least of loss from the companyshould be trained to ensure that their skills are
itself. This usually translates into sourcing outindeed of a quality to allow the company to deal
resources that is projected to yield the most inwith the crisis. This is where e-learning solutions
terms of results for the company, without thecome in, to compliment the training to be given to
company having to shell out too much to acquirethe workforce.e-Learning solutions provide an ideal
it or accrue a large expense in the production oftraining implement to the training of the remaining
the favorable results. For some companies, thismembers of the work force, since there is a
would necessarily mean downsizing their existingmarked difference in the expense of using
workforce and retaining only those that aree-learning solutions and sourcing out individuals or
particularly indispensable, or those who are able toinstitutions that offer corporate training courses
function in multiple capacities, so as to precludeon fields of study or skills upgrade that is related
any slowing in production and operations, even ifto the needs of the company. While there may
the workforce has been cut in half in number.be a standing argument as to the
There companies, however, that frown upon thiscost-effectiveness of using e-learning tools versus
practice, and see the massive laying off ofthat of a traditional training scenario where a
employees as not only unjust but also a veryclassroom setting is used, to facilitate the
unwise move on the part of management, sincesupposed "learning atmosphere", there is the
the greatest resource of the company is beingserious matter of cost and time versus
compromised in removing such a large portion ofacceptable loss ratio factor for the companies
the work force, namely the employeesthat are in dire need of a solution to their sagging
themselves. While these forward-thinkingoutput result and revenue situation. One of the
companies do acknowledge the need to stem thewinning aspects of this argument is the fact that
bleeding of finances of the company by removingcompared to the traditional classroom setting, a
employees deemed as redundant, they will alllearning management system has been proven to
agree that the general scale that is practicedtake up significantly less time to accomplish the
during such massive lay offs is simply too much.desired learning exercise, and in companies that
What is needed is to identify the tasks that canput a premium in maximizing the output of the
still be efficiently be performed by certainworkforce in terms of man hours, this aspect is
members of the workforce, and then put intodefinitely something which is quite favorable.
effect a re-evaluation of the number of the work